• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    You called it overblown. Now you’re saying it’s just as good as what happened later. I think you need to make up your mind.

    • demlet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually I said sort of the opposite: what’s been done since then is just as good as what was done back then, which therefore is overblown by people who claim it’s somehow better. No contradiction.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nobody claimed it was better. You said it was overblown, to which I countered that some of the best music ever recorded is from that era, therefore not overblown. Some of the best music ever recorded is newer too. But for rock and roll, that was the era in which a lot of magic happened, a lot of progress was made, and it changed the face of music for everything that came after. So it’s not overblown. That doesn’t mean it’s better than whatever music you think I’m comparing it to. It means that it stands on its own as worthy of the praise it receives.

        • demlet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I guess that’s fair enough. I’ve just run into way too many people who seem to think it’s the only music worth listening to or something. I can agree with what you said pretty much.