• Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    She’s an absolute scumbag, but yes, certain dog breeds that only exist to be violent, such as Rottweilers, should simply be ended. That’s pretty obvious, I would have thought.

    But… Violent people don’t care about the safety of others, and don’t see a problem with abusing dogs to get what they want out of them either.

    • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Rottweilers aren’t known for being particularly violent though. Yes they’re big dogs, but they’re largely big softies personality wise.

      • LogarithmicCamel@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Rottweilers are responsible for the second highest number of attacks after pitbulls. They seem to be at least more dangerous than the average dog.

        • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Clearly theres an issue with this breed given how many incidents they’re responsible for of late.

    • Reddit_Is_Trash@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      You know nothing about dogs. If you raise them in an uun-abusive way they will not be violent.

      Don’t be fucking surprised when a living creature lashes out and bites you after years of you hitting of yelling at it. Treat dogs with respect and they’ll respect you back.

      If they happen to maim a home invader, who cares? They could have prevented it by being functional members of society instead of a scurge.