• trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    5 months ago

    Is anyone else bothered (but not surprised) by the fact that Amazon/Twitch agreed to cover it up for him? Seems pretty wild that they should be off the hook for working to protect his image after doing predatory shit like this.

    • TheBest@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think they kept it on the low because they don’t want people realizing that they’re viewing the contents of their whispers, even if you have no reasonable expectation of privacy.

    • Xer0@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Everyone will forget about twitch’s involvement within a week. Just like every time literally any big event happens with any company.

        • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          They paid him to go away and to shut up. Twitch letting one of their most popular creators message sexual content to a minor over their platform for years is a PR nightmare. Shows the lack of oversight social media has. Why would they even allow a 12 year old the ability to private message a 30 year old to begin with?!

          Edit: and I’m sure twitch found more dirt going through all his communications. This pedo was even planning a meet up with this minor before the minors parent put a stop to it and notified twitch.

          • pelotron@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Beware that points like this suggest that messaging platforms should be monitoring all communications sent between users. If that’s the world you want to live in, ok, fine… But in this case the guy that committed the crime is the one who has been punished. Isn’t that the correct result?

            • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I’m just saying that, maybe if you are a creator making content primarily watched by children, the trade off for making money (millions in this case.) off of our platform, is we get to monitor your communications with said audience on our platform? It’s like saying a banker who uses their work email to coordinate a crime. My work has email monitoring that looks for financial crimes because surprisingly people are dumb enough to use work email for elicit activities. Yes his messages to individuals are “private” but should they be when in a position of power? He messaged a minor through twitches chat (twitch is essentially his whole job) and twitch has NO safeguards to prevent abuse?!