• awwwyissss@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah if it actually goes towards climate change and “uniting humanity” that’s way better than giving it to any government.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      And if it isn’t done with anti-public stuff on the side. Take bill gates, he funded a Covid vaccine which is great! But strings were attached, namely they were required to patent it. His charity consistently mandates ownership of intellectual property and partnerships with corporations. I fear something similar with bezos. You’re gonna need new technology and a push against overconsumption to do Jack shit against climate change. I fully expect him to not permit that new technology to reject patent or use a copyleft style license agreement. And I don’t believe the owner of Amazon will promote things like creating a society where we only work 20 hours and consume less low quality goods, instead opting for long lasting and repairable things that end up using less natural resources in the long run. Instead I expect him to throw billions at carbon capture, which is needed and can be done responsibly (especially if we build a strategic biofuel reserve), but is also the carbon equivalent of trying to out exercise your fork.