aside from the issues that other commenters have addressed, I think the titles are too short to accurately describe the subject matter
I can see what they were going for but the titles do not match the paragraphs well enough for me
misleading titles, for things presented as myths, (with corrections in parenthesis):
Multiple personalities (exists as MPD)
The Vomitorium (exists)
Black holes (exists)
Different tongue parts (exists)
Left & right brain (exists)
Evolution is a ‘theory’ (true)
I’d write these as:
Schizophrenia does/should not mean multiple personalities
People did not vomit in vomitoriums
Black holes are not literal holes*
The tongue does not taste in distinct places
Both brain hemispheres can learn the same functions/talents
Evolution matches our current data the best; scientific theories are not just conjecture**
*I don’t think this is really correct either, but that is an issue outside of the scope of just the titles
**I am not too confident on this rewrite, I’m not sure I could make it short and have good quality, but you could go with either side of the semicolon for a shorter single title
There were other issues I had with the titles, but I felt that I was too unsure about them to present them here
aside from the issues that other commenters have addressed, I think the titles are too short to accurately describe the subject matter
I can see what they were going for but the titles do not match the paragraphs well enough for me
misleading titles, for things presented as myths, (with corrections in parenthesis):
I’d write these as:
*I don’t think this is really correct either, but that is an issue outside of the scope of just the titles
**I am not too confident on this rewrite, I’m not sure I could make it short and have good quality, but you could go with either side of the semicolon for a shorter single title
There were other issues I had with the titles, but I felt that I was too unsure about them to present them here