What is Defederation?

Defederation means we have disconnected our instance from another, and users from our instance will no longer be able to see anything (communities, posts or comments) coming from it, and their users won’t be able to see anything coming from ours.


What will get an Instance Defederated?

Our goal is to avoid defederation, but we will do so under the following circumstances:

  • The instance spreads overwhelming amounts of drama, hate or negativity.

  • The instance is mostly made up bots, and or promotes spam.

  • The instance allows the harassment or doxxing of others.

  • The instance knowingly hosts CSAM or other illegal content.


Has FMHY Defederated Instances?

Only two, both for breaking the 1st rule above:

  • exploding-heads

  • lemmygrad


Things to Note:

  • There are circumstances where we may block a specific community within an instance, rather than blocking the entire instance itself, but this is very uncommon.

  • Remember that if there’s a community you don’t like, you can block it entirely in settings.

  • Keep in mind that our goal is to keep this community safe, so if you see something that breaks our rules please don’t hesitate to report it.

  • If its something urgent, you can always contact us easily via Divolt 💬. Its connected to our discord, so there are mods online 24/7.

  • nekat_emanresu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really like that you are codifying policy like this.

    The “instance is mostly made up by bots” is obviously a great call but your wording makes it sound like <50% bots is cool, >50% bots is not cool. haha

  • ziggurism@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The hysterics over the as yet purely hypothetical prospect of Facebook/Threads being on the fediverse, along with some worrying signs of censorship, have caused me to to flee lemmy.world. Here’s hoping FMHY will be a better fit for me.

    • kuna@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Threads already violates rules 1 and 3, hosting people who escalated their harrassment into real life multiple times already, so I hope the decision to block them (should they ever choose to federate) is a no-brainer to FMHY admins.

      • ziggurism@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        How is threads more overwhelmingly negative or tolerant of doxxing than other major platforms? Like what is the basis for your comment?

        • kuna@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Threads is owned by Meta, which:

          If your point is that Meta is no worse than Twitter or whatever other corporate media, then whatever, I’m not really interested in discussions about whether it’s better to come down with plague or leprosy. They all suck.

          If your point is that Threads itself isn’t technically compilicit in anything yet after being up for 10 days, then I think that’s pretty naive.

          • ziggurism@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Also if you’re gonna mention genocides that Facebook is complicit with, don’t forget the Rohingya genocide

          • ziggurism@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You cited rule 1, which is

            The instance spreads overwhelming amounts of drama, hate or negativity.

            And rule 3

            The instance allows the harassment or doxxing of others.

            So the question is whether the fediverse instance Threads has done the bad actions.

            You are arguing for a preemptive defederation based on the actions of the corporate parent having nothing to do with content on the instance in question.

            Since libsoftiktok is on Twitter not Facebook, it seems you want to be defederated from Threads based on the actions of not just Meta, but also Musk’s Twitter.

            I mean it’s an argument, and many agree with it. Many instances have already defederated threads.net. but it’s certainly not in the rules cited in this post.

              • ziggurism@lemmy.fmhy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Wait. Threads requires an instagram account. How can libsoftiktok be on threads if she is permabanned from IG.

                Are you even sure this is true or is this just a rumor that you’re repeating?

                Edit: there does appear to be an account called libsoftiktokofficial. Not sure whether it’s really Chaya but it has plenty of anti-trans propaganda

                • kuna@lemmy.fmhy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Ok fair, I’m not familiar enough with Threads lore to know if libsoftiktokofficial is really Chaya or not, and why the account is up if they were banned twice. It looks like their last post is from 6 days ago, but I’m not sure if I’m seeing the up-to-date view from the web interface from Europe (and honestly I can’t be arsed to try a VPN for that). Perhaps the whole situation on Threads right now is just early platform chaos.

                  In any case, the whole discussion might be moot, if any of these happens to Threads:

                  • Flops after the instagrammers get bored of it.
                  • Thrives, but never enables federation.
                  • Enables federation, but only as an allowlist for select big instances (like mastodon.social).
                  • Enables open federation (RIP their mods after poa.st and people spinning up throwaway Pleroma instances catch a whiff of it), but the interface to Lemmy is too awkward for anyone to bother (like federation with Mastodon is wonky already).
                  • Federation with random tiny Lemmy instances works in an usable manner, but someone on their side defederates after noticing that FMHY admins are very ok with piracy.

                  On the off chance that none of that happens, though, I’m not sure what is to be gained from federating with an instance that has orders of magnitude more users than the entire fediverse combined (even if their count is inflated) and the only moderation policy is “whatever makes Zucc richer”.

              • ziggurism@lemmy.fmhy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Libsoftiktok started on Twitter. And while she did have an instagram account, it was banned from both instagram and Facebook, while the Twitter account had its shadowban lifted after Musk took over.

                Given that Meta is presenting Threads as Twitter, but “sanely run”, and that libsoftiktok has already been permabanned twice, it seems likely that she will also be banned from Threads. Certainly this is a weird point to hang your case for defederating Threads on.

  • jray4559@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would have preferred to have a no-defederation policy (except for maybe threads due to EEE fears), but as long as it is not swung around constantly, I am okay with it.

    The two that are blocked are political circlejerks that I personally dislike anyways. I am hopeful there is not more.

        • UncouthDude@lemmy.fmhy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just curious, how could Meta EEE in the case of the fediverse/ lemmy? As in, technically how does them joining as an instance affect others whether they’re blocked or not?

          And what advantages would there be to preemptively devederating instead of waiting or leaving it to users?

          I’m kind of hoping Threads can lend credibility/ momentum to the fediverse so if I’m missing something about how they could negatively impact it I’m earnestly interested.

          • jray4559@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Centralization. Meta will develop the fediverse protocol up with their own specific enhancements, locking most of us onto their version of the platform due to convenience given enough time. (Think RCS as an example, it’s technically an open standard but Google has effective control of it thanks to special features)

            You might say “Well, if they are a better platform, so what, why not go there”, but the problem is that they can cut off the rest of the fediverse as “outdated” essentially privatizing everybody.

  • 0x4E4F@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    and their users won’t be able to see anything coming from ours.

    That is not true, beehaw defederated from sh.itjust.works, but we can still see posts from beehaw in our feed. Granted, if we comment, nothing gets sent back to beehaw, only members of sh.itjust.works will see those comments.

  • rbits@lemmy.fmhy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, very cool. And about Threads, I will probably block Threads myself just because it’s a twitter clone, it doesn’t need to be on lemmy. But people should be able to make that decision themselves.

    • iorale@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think preemtive defederation/blocking from Threads is the most logical decision for every instance since we are talking about a known hostile company, not something new testing the waters that nobody knows how it will behave, it’s Meta being Meta (even if they are trying to hide it behind the “by Instagram” slogan).

    • pensivepangolin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Out of curiosity, what’s the deal with exploding-heads? I keep seeing them referenced negatively all over several instances.

      Edit: thanks for all the replies! I’ve got it now hahaha

      • Supermariofan67@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        At first I thought it was just some edgy troll community, but it didn’t take long for me to find a fairly upvoted comment saying “look, I just don’t like immigrants” or something like that. So yeah, seems like that kind of place over there…

  • Maebbie@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    defederate enough and people will switch, much less friction to just go to a more open instance. much better than what we had with centralized sites.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t defederate enough and people will switch to a less objectionable instance.

      It’s a balancing act.

      • Maebbie@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        how is it the instances job to moderate for the user? I get defederating from like spam stuff, however the user should be in charge of its own flavour. Well, we will see what approach wins, i just find it odd how one can choose federation over centralization and still prefers to be babysit.

        • Zorque@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because there’s no one broad brush one can paint everything with to solve all issues. It takes a variety of approaches to solve the variety of problems that occur in the world.

          Those running instances are people too, and they create their instance for a purpose. If that purpose is to let people go hog wild, including bigots and authoritarians, then they can refuse to do any defederating (or moderating, I suppose, if it’s solely the responsibility of the user to curate content as you purport). The thing is… that doesn’t make an instance particularly palatable to people who dislike when other people are dipshits around them. And, rather than get into prolonged troll-baiting contests, they decide to just go somewhere better… all that leaves is the bigots and authoritarians… and the people who feed their need for attention by arguing with them.

          I don’t believe cutting everyone out who says something you object to, even to the smallest degree, is a good solution. Often people are teetering on the edge of extremism, and just need a rational counterpoint to help them tip the right way… but sometimes you just need to remove toxicity from your life. When it comes to running instances, you can either take the laissez faire approach and let people do whatever they want… and welcome the extremists that draws in. Or you can take a more active, albeit gentle, hand. So you promote a place worthy of discussion and fun.

  • can@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Defederation means we have disconnected our instance from another, and our users will no longer be able to see communities, posts or comments from users on the defederated instance.

    It should be noted that it’s a two way street, no? They won’t see any content from here either?

    Also, I thought single community ban from other instances wasn’t possible yet? I remember the vlemmy guy saying that before going MIA.

    • nbats@lemmy.fmhy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah good point, I just added that it goes both ways. As far as blocking single communities go I don’t have all the details but I’ve been told we’ve done it for one so far.

      • boots@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is it possible to list blocked communities in the /instances page? Or at least list them in a post? Just so users know what’s being blocked.