The landlord had told them he wanted to raise the rent to $3,500 and when they complained he decided to raise it to $9,500.

“We know that our building is not rent controlled and this was something we were always worried about happening and there is no way we can afford $9,500 per month," Yumna Farooq said.

  • nikt@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is a similar rule in Ontario, but it doesn’t apply to buildings built after 2018.

    This exemption was put in place as an incentive for more rental units to be put on the market (or to enrich developers and landholders, depending on your political stance).

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        A floating rent-control date

        … is still a bad idea. Let’s not focus on what kind of bat we’re beaten with; let’s just get Ontario back on track.

      • Rocket@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure that works. The idea was that if rent control was lifted, there would be incentive to build new units. Trouble is, the building didn’t happen as expected. New housing starts even declined after the change came into effect. Balance is not going to give more incentive to build.

        Since it didn’t work, we may as well go back to a proper rent control system. A proper one, not the completely ridiculous one that sees young, struggling families subsidizing rich retires that we currently have on those <2018 properties.

    • frostbiker@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is no limit to yearly increases in the real world. You get a phone call from your landlord telling you that they want to sell/renovate the unit, you get the hint and tell them that you will accept a rent increase, then magically they no longer want to sell/renovate. Happened to me with an otherwise “good” landlord.

      • debunker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        In the Netherlands they can sell, but the renting agreement stays in place, so you can just stay there. If they want renovate they can offer to buy of your contract or they have to find you another apartment with equal facilities and for the same price range. A lot of these excesses can be covered by good legislation.

        • Obi@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Renter protection is very strong in the Netherlands, probably one of the strongest in the world.

          Used to be that squatter rights were also very strong but I believe that has reduced now.

        • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It always feels like the countries in that region go out of their way to put every roadblock they can in front of pathetic little schemer pricks who only want to rob everyone of every penny. Here in the US, the politicians go out of their way to make sure there’s every possible loophole for corruption and morally bankrupt pieces of shit to abuse.

        • can@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A lot of these excesses can be covered by good legislation.

          So we’re fucked, great.