Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldM to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months ago[meme] Lawns and car storage — name a more wasteful use of landlemmy.worldimagemessage-square167fedilinkarrow-up11.14Karrow-down167
arrow-up11.07Karrow-down1image[meme] Lawns and car storage — name a more wasteful use of landlemmy.worldFried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldM to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square167fedilink
minus-squarechiliedogg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·7 months agoIt really depends on the specific grass and underlying soils, as you say. I’m the guy at the City making landscape architects and civil engineers comply with drainage and water quality regulations. We live off the tears of developers.
minus-squareTheFonz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·7 months agoPlanner I’m guessing? Are you the one I’m fighting the minimum parking requirements for each project? 🥲
minus-squarechiliedogg@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-27 months agoPlanning yes. But we fight over impervious cover over the aquifer recharge zone and building retaining walls in in conservation and drainage easements. And setbacks. Good god we fight over setbacks.
![[meme] Lawns and car storage — name a more wasteful use of land](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c6a93d55-ab0b-4275-bd92-43931e7b7d77.jpeg){kind=link}
It really depends on the specific grass and underlying soils, as you say.
I’m the guy at the City making landscape architects and civil engineers comply with drainage and water quality regulations.
We live off the tears of developers.
Planner I’m guessing? Are you the one I’m fighting the minimum parking requirements for each project? 🥲
Planning yes. But we fight over impervious cover over the aquifer recharge zone and building retaining walls in in conservation and drainage easements.
And setbacks. Good god we fight over setbacks.