• protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      It doesn’t say anything about the DNC. Are you sure you read all the words present here?

      • sgnl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I guess the implication is that the DNC picks who goes on to the general elections, which kinda makes sense for their party. I don’t think that was necessarily a massive leap in logic either.

        But hey we all figure things out at different paces, hostility is unnecessary.

    • stankmut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      The DNC didn’t select them, those picks won the primaries. The voters picked them.

          • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Because she only ever needed about 30% of the vote in the primaries to win. Unpledged delegates made that the case, and they all fell in line with Hillary. Then heavily advertising the disadvantage Sanders is at in delegates to depress the Sanders vote.

            My state is a good example of this - Sanders got over half the votes and Hillary got 35%, which is why Hillary only got one more delegate than he did in my state.

        • stankmut@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          It’s weird. It’s usually the people who don’t understand how primaries work who are the ones to think the popular vote picks the president. Glad to see you understand at least one part of the electoral process.