So you believe that pictures of consenting naked underage people should be freely shared and even made available in magazines because making them illegal is fascism?
I experimented with tor and signal at some point and it was enlightening to see how much of “the internet” as we think we know it is already heavily filtered and served to us through a very narrow pipeline of modern browsers.
That’s how society works in general and I don’t understand how people think letting the internet be free of laws wouldn’t lead to shit.
Ohh books next! GOP is getting ahead there.
You get the laws you vote for.
“Fascism is only bad bad when it’s the other side” - You
So you believe that pictures of consenting naked underage people should be freely shared and even made available in magazines because making them illegal is fascism?
Right to child porn. Classic.
There are narrow exceptions of course. Imagine comparing tiktok and child porn and thinking you are making a point.
CSAM, underage pornography, hate speech, death threats…
“There are narrow exceptions of course”
Yep, exactly and these exceptions apply to the web as well, just because you’re on the internet it doesn’t allow you to do whatever the fuck you want.
Again, you are comparing death threats to 30 second videos. Unhinged stuff.
No, I’m giving examples of things you accept being banned without calling it fascism.
I experimented with tor and signal at some point and it was enlightening to see how much of “the internet” as we think we know it is already heavily filtered and served to us through a very narrow pipeline of modern browsers.