• deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Drastic has been around for a long time, and for a good while, it was the best supported one on Android. It was definitely worth the flat, one time $5 charge that I paid like 10 years ago.

    Really, that’s the ideal: flat, reasonable charge for lifetime use of the software that is still getting updates a decade later.

    But realistically speaking, the dev hasn’t actually done much work on it in the last few years beyond bug fixing (not that there’s much left to add in the first place). The price wasn’t terrible but the insistence on the keeping it paid hurt the ability to sideload it when you needed to. It should have been free a long time ago, especially after it got so much competition.

    • isles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      This timing is very interesting with the Yuzu/Citra shutdown - do you suspect the change has anything to do with not want to make money from a Nintendo emulator as be less of a target? Or is there something fundamentally different about Drastic?

    • mrfriki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I will add that I don’t mind if, on top o the flat rate, there is a few years of free updates until you have to renew your license, as long as you can keep using your “outdated version“ for as long as you want. I see this model in many professional apps I’ve used over the years (Sketch or Affinity apps for example) and I find it very reasonable because I understand that ongoing development requires investment.