• ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    9 months ago

    Wow, the corrupt supreme court that’s in the pocket of the far right protected their party’s criminal candidate? Color me shocked!

    So fucking predictable. They’ve just pissed away the last few drops of their credibility.

      • SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        9 months ago

        The decision was unanimous that states can’t decide this. 4 of them think the prohibition is self-executing, which would have kept Trump off anyway but nationwide

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Self executing what does that even mean in this context?

          “Oh hey Trump I know you were on the ballot but it magically disappeared because the universe knows what you did last summer winter. People don’t have to enforce the law, some laws just magically enforce themselves!”

          • SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Meaning you don’t need some action to invoke it, it’s just there. You can’t get on the ballot if you’re under 35, an immigrant, or a traitor.

            • Asafum@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yeah and we can see how that “works.” It takes a person to enforce it, that’s what happened, and then the SCOTUS said “nah not like that, it needs to be magic.”

      • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I should clarify: a few of them aren’t in the right’s pocket. Arguably they are too biased the other way, but the court had traditionally been balanced fairly well most of the time. Not so for the last decade or more.

        I get that the argument presented to them wasn’t the best, and that’s where the unanimity came from. But let’s face it, the court has been a joke for a while now. And for whatever reason, I am not at all surprised that they sided with Trump.

        Edit: also, to say it was a unanimous decision isn’t exactly accurate. It was more complicated than that.

        https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2024/03/supreme-court-metadata-sotomayor-trump-dissent.html