• brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    And when people say they are “anti-tankie”, they actually mean that they are anti doing anything about the awareness of systematic inequality that tankie indicates. By definition, someone who is against change/progress is a conservative, so when someone says they are anti-tankie, they are by definition expressing a conservative stance. That is, wanting to do something about systemic inequality is synonymous with having a progressive stance on systemic inequality.

    Being a tankie, on the other hand, is not synonymous with being a comunist. Tankies are just one form of communist (militant).

    Other way around: communists are just one form of tankies, the word is also used to refer to anarchists and some soc-dems.

    • LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re spun around, flipped upside-down, and confused as can be.

      Tankie is a term that specifically refers to one particular kind of communism; namely, the kind that supports authoritarian regimes that try to impose communism through the use of force to repress dissent.

      You can be a communist and not be a tankie. You cannot be against progress and be a progressive.

      • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re spun around, flipped upside-down, and confused as can be.

        Very compelling, but have you considered

        spoiler

        PIGPOOPBALLS

        Tankie is a term that specifically refers to one particular kind of communism

        No, it’s used to refer a wide, vague blob of vibes, just like the word woke. The people who use it can can do use it to refer to all kinds of communists, most anarchists, and anything to the left of Elizabeth Warren in general.

        that try to impose communism through the use of force.

        As opposed to the kind of communism where you ask nicely for revolution? Have you actually read any Marx? I guarantee he was not a pacifist.

        You can be a communist and not be a tankie

        By your own definition you cannot, let alone by a definition of tankie that describes how libs actually use it.

        • LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          As opposed to the kind of communism where you ask nicely for revolution? Have you actually read any Marx? I guarantee he was not a pacifist.

          You deliberately misquoted me by cutting off the end of that sentence so you could have a nice soft strawman to swing at. The full sentence said

          that try to impose communism through the use of force to repress dissent.

          Forceful revolution by the workers against the capitalist class is a completely different matter from forceful repression of dissent by the state against students and professors.

      • AcidSmiley [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tankie is a term that specifically refers to one particular kind of communism

        Nope, tankie originally referred specifically to British labor party members supporting the USSR’s actions against the coup in Hungary, and today is used to refer to any anti-imperialist leftist, regardless of tendency. Of course all of you claim otherwise, but these claims are provably empty, as nobody who uses the term today, including you in this thread, bothers to check for the actual political views of the people you call tankie, you see something that may go against the state department narratives that are spoonfed to you by V*ush and the reddit front page or whoever else has done this pseudo-leftist brainworming to you and you start yelling tankie at the top of your liberal, western-chauvinist lungs. A good number of the people posting on hexbear are anarchists and DemSocs, but you will label all of them tankie as long as they critically support China or question the narrative on the new forever war in Ukraine, which to you equals “thinking today’s Russia is true communism” and similar nonsense. Your understanding of politics is damaged beyond repair by being socialized as a smartass debatelord who has become entirely incapable of forming judgements not based on learned reflex and of engaging in good faith conversations. I would pity you if people like you wouldn’t be such a disaster for the Western left and for anybody in the Global South suffering from the continued imperialism you help enable by fighting the last genuine critics of genocidal US policies that are left in the West. You CIA tool, you psyop casualty, you neocon bootlicker.

        • LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t call someone a tankie based on where they post, but in what they post. If you don’t want to be called a tankie, then don’t post tankie shit.

          • AcidSmiley [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            If showing solidarity with victims of Amerikan imperialism makes me a tankie, i’ll prefer that over being a white supremacist warmonger who justifies the bombing of brown people in “shithole countries” like literally everybody who calls people a tankie online.

              • AcidSmiley [she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                So what if i say “China is far from perfect, but the people there are a lot happier with their government than the Amerikans, they are much less of a threat geopolitically, maybe we should leave them alone because it’s honestly none of our business how the Chinese govern themselves”? Is it the usual 50 cent wumao genocide denier tinaman square then?

                • LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s not how the world works in the year 2023. Isolationism just isn’t a conceivable possibility. All countries are interconnected, and what’s happening in one country influences what’s happening in other countries in major ways.

        • ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          even anarchist communes have use of force, those moltov cocktails being thrown at police officers arent non-violent and even recent projects like CHAZ/CHOP had para-police forces setup within them to hold order togther