cross-posted from: https://kbin.social/m/tech/t/364852

Anti-piracy group Rights Alliance removed the prominent “Books3” database, that was used to train high profile AI models.

  • alex [they, il]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Once again it’s that “worst person you know just made a great point” headline

    • sapient [they/them]@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m actually pretty pro-AI (and in particular, pro-FOSS AI), so I’m pretty unhappy about this myself ;p

      If nothing else, this kind of shit will mean that only the existing “Intellectual Property” holders will have access to using AI. It would entrench things even more >.<

  • FaceDeer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    It may be illegal to distribute it, but it’s not illegal to read it. Or train an AI on it, which is the same process.

    • maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Would commercializing the trained AI count as a commercial public performance though? The legal problems with AI don’t come with the training, but when you start selling it.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t see what the problem would be. The AI model and its outputs are not derivative works from a legal perspective.