EDIT: Don’t bother reporting people criticizing others for not wearing a helmet. It’s not victim blaming, just like criticizing someone for not wearing a seatbelt isn’t victim blaming.

Wear your helmets people: Of course nobody deserves to get hit by a car but the reality is people are getting hit by cars.

  • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t think it should be mandatory. I’d probably apply that to seatbelts too though I’m pretty sure that such mandate does increase safety. I just don’t think it’s the government’s job to decide such things. It’s not illegal to hit oneself in the head with a hammer either.

    Here in Finland it recently became mandatory to have lights on your bike when riding in poor visibility and I think that’s actually a good thing. Not because it increases the safety of cyclists, though it does, but because I as a driver don’t want to deal with the burden of killing/injuring an irresponsible cyclist/pedestrian that I didn’t see untill it was too late. It’s unreasonable to put the full responsibility on drivers. Especially outside of cities.

    • Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not wearing a seatbelt makes you more likely to harm others in the event of a collision. And there’s a little bit of necessary nanny-state of making parents do the smart thing and protect their children.

      • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Not wearing a seatbelt makes you more likely to harm others in the event of a collision.

        How? The way I see it is that not wearing a seatbelt only makes it more likely to harm yourself with the exception of rear-seat passengers possibly injuring front-seat passengers but I think that’s on the driver’s responsibility to make sure they’re all buckled up. My car doesn’t move if the passengers doesn’t have their seatbelts on.

        • Akuchimoya@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m a light fender-bender, there’s not much danger. In a full-speed collision, an unsecured person becomes a blunt force projectile. An unsecured person can move with enough force to be thrown out of the car. Imagine that same force thrown at a passenger instead.

          • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            with the exception of rear-seat passengers possibly injuring front-seat passengers

            As I mentioned. Other than that I don’t see what the danger is. You got to be insanely unlucky to be hit by an unsecured passenger that was thrown out of a vehicle.

            • Akuchimoya@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Not an unsecured passenger that’s thrown out of the car, an unsecured passenger being thrown into another passenger who is in the car.

        • Soggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          If the driver becomes dislodged in what would have been a minor collision had they been strapped in. Much more likely to lose control of the vehicle and crash into others.

    • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Do you think seatbelt laws have a negative effect on mode share for cars?

      Then ask yourself the same question about helmet laws.