Former President Donald Trump will likely run out of legal defense funds this summer, Bloomberg reported.

In 2023, Trump spent $51.2 million on legal costs and has a further $23.5 million available for lawyers’ fees — but that source of money will likely dry up around July, the report said.

The ex-president may now be forced to turn to a few undesirable options to cover his costs.

  • Heikki@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    137
    ·
    9 months ago

    Man, I really hope the RNC decides to help him so he can bankrupt them too

  • NotAFuckingBot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    9 months ago

    The ex-president may now be forced to turn to a few undesirable options to cover his costs.

    Isn’t that his entire M.O.?

    • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Yes $400k will put a huge dent in this. As it’s supposed to be a limited run of 1000, unless of course there’s going to be more fraud involved.

      • Peer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 months ago

        The 399 sneakers were just to draw attention to his other sneakers that are more affordable on the same site. Those will presumably bring in the lion share of the money.

  • The Pantser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    9 months ago

    The ex-president may now be forced to turn to a few undesirable options to cover his costs.

    Like selling ugly scene clothing? Magats sporting the ugly red hats and gold T sneakers. Worst brand ever.

  • Kid_Thunder@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Don’t worry, he’ll end up still having enough funds for a legal defence after the RNC is backrupt due to it. We will find out in 5 years or so that it turns out Russia backed his funds for legal defense and some loans or something. He’ll say it was due to a ‘great business deal because Russia are great business people, maybe the greatest’ due to like a $500 million ‘business’ deal to put Trump’s name on a random warehouse out in the middle of Siberia.

  • newtraditionalists@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I really wanna see his hair wet. I wonder how long those whispy little strands really are. I bet they’re like a foot long, all coming from the one random spot on his bloated head that still grows hair with any structural integrity, the rest being brittle and unable to hold any shape, even with a whole bottle of hairspray applied. Disgusting. I’m mad at myself for making myself think this thought lol hence why I am now cursing all of you.

    • DrMango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      He just twirls a few long strands on the top of his head like spaghetti every morning then hair sprays the crap out of it

    • toast@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      We need a hero - a hero with a garden hose. While Trump always looks foolish, making him look the right kind of foolish might just shake a few of his cult away from him

    • ashok36@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      He did the ice bucket challenge during the 2016 race if you want to see that. It was less eventful than you’d think.

  • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 months ago

    Is there a law against using party donations on legal defense? If so, then I’ll take “things he is charged with in Nov 2024.”

    • hansl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 months ago

      There is, but it doesn’t cover PACs. He’s technically not been using campaign fund, but asking supporters to give for his campaign with some very specific fine print to say they’re actually giving the PAC to do as they please.

      It’s shady but not illegal.

      • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        I guess the plus side of Trump being president before is all the loopholes the public have learned about. We are living in a very very failed democracy.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 months ago

          We are living in a very very failed democracy.

          Democracy really requires ethical people being voted into office, as we can’t watch them 24/7 since we are busy with our own lives. Unfortunately we citizens don’t seem to be able to do that very well.

      • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        If he’s asking for people to give to a PAC doesn’t that shift from shady to illegal? I thought politicians had to be completely separate from the PAC.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s shady but not illegal.

        It can’t help but think that should be used as a catchphrase for advertising purposes, by the political parties.

  • Pratai@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m sure he can just keep selling his golden sneakers to launder rubles from Russia.

    (Wow… we live in a world where that sentences makes sense)

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s the end of the article. He’s selling $399 Trump-branded “never surrender” sneakers claiming it’s “not political”

      • zeppo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Right. He claims everything else about him is political, like being prosecuted for crimes or civil offenses, but not the shoe selling though…

  • Blackout@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    There’s always money in the banana stand. Eric needs a break from running it anyways.

    • fulcrummed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Love this reference! It got me thinking - is Eric more like Buster? Jnr is Gob. Baron is George Michael. Melania is Lindsay, ivanka is maeby, Ivana was Lucille, Lucille 2 is about to take over the RNC. Michael cohen = Barry Zuckercorn and Trump is George Sr who may have committed some light treason and definitely hires the worst lawyers.

      • TrippaSnippa@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’d say Eric is more like Buster because if they had a Michael they might not be in so much trouble.

        • root_beer@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah, there is definitely no Michael in this family, because anyone with a good head in their shoulders actually did manage to leave the family before being caught in their miasma of chaos and grift

          [season 4 Michael disappointed me so much]

  • root_beer@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 months ago

    Correction: Trump supporters will likely run out of legal defense funds by summer

    Trump isn’t running out of anything, unless you count whatever hall leads to the bathroom, in which he won’t make it in time

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Correction of emphasis, Trump supporters will run out of funds in the summer. Then he’ll shift to the RNC paying his legal bills. They already were, prior to when he declared as a candidate for 2024.

  • mintiefresh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s tiring reading news about him still and there have been no consequences. I’m kind of just resigned to that fact that he might win the election anyways and all his problems will just go away.

    • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      He just got fined $350+ million and banned from running his own company for 3 years. He just got hit with an $83 million judgement against him for sexually assaulting a woman.

      The consequences have begun.

        • Thirdborne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          He can’t appeal without bonding the full amount and nobody was willing to bond the 5 million he got hit with last year. Looks a lot like he just has to put up the cash.

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I can’t see him doing this… he’s going move money his money to somewhere he thinks the government can’t get it and declare bankruptcy.

            He’s gonna go full Alex Jones.

              • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Right… forgot about that. But I feel like that just limits his shenanigans and hes got a lifetime of experience at shenanigans. I dunno really, but I’m not betting against Trump’s crook skills.

            • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              He’s already had to put up $5.5 mil that he couldn’t weasel out of.

              Trump has already deposited $5 million owed to Carroll for the first defamation case into a court-controlled account, along with an additional $500,000 in interest required by New York law. Carroll will not have access to the funds until the appeals process plays out.

              He may soon be forced to do the same for the $83.3 million judgment in the second Carroll verdict. Alternatively, he could secure a bond and pay only a portion up front — though that option would come with interest and fees and likely require some form of collateral. Trump would have to find a financial institution willing to front him the money.

              https://apnews.com/article/trump-fraud-carroll-fines-82d423b8e7a7f9a32470729c5f4410e5

              • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Yeah $5M for the publicity of an appeal which he’ll likely lose, that he’ll pay. When it’s hundreds of millions, which he may not even have the full amount? He’s gonna Alex Jones that shit.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          There’s no appeal here. He has nothing to point to for procedural errors or unconstitutional laws. Plus he has to put up the money before he can do anything.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      He lost his business empire and has to pay more than $450m. How is that not consequences?

      • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        He lost his ability to do business in one state, which likely just means he’ll do it by proxy

        And I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if he weasels his way out of paying somehow

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          And I wouldn’t be a bit surprised if he weasels his way out of paying somehow

          He has a deadline of 30 days to pay, and in order to appeal he first has to put 110% of the amount owing in escrow.

          • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’ll believe he’ll pay when he pays. I see no reason to start thinking he’s going to do what he’s supposed to, required to, do when that’s never been what he’s done. I honestly doubt he’ll give up that money until it’s forcibly pulled from his accounts.

            Maybe this time will be different and the rules will actually apply to him. Maybe this time Lucy won’t pull that football back. Until that actually happens, forgive me if I’m sceptical that things are going to be different this time around.

          • laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            What misinformation am I spreading? That I think something is or isn’t going to happen?

            I assure you that it is very accurate that I’m prepared to see him find some way to weasel out of this, and I’m not sure how you could possibly know whether or not I think the things I say I think.

            Again: I’ll believe it when it happens. Not before then. I’m done believing the right thing will happen when it comes to him since it so rarely has.