• TachyonTele_Esq@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    He was literally paying people to vote a certain way.

    (Well, he promised he would, and the winner was his employee… But still)

      • forkDestroyer@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Twitter seemed to shift every ad to be anti Kamala before the election. They rolled out these ads on top of other ads. I think even promoted ads had anti Kamala ads on them.

        Would love to see what the people working at Twitter during that period could leak. Twitter files 2

  • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Cool, let’s see the Discovery that comes from that lawsuit. I’m 100% positive he doesn’t want that shit anywhere near his business.

    • nosuchanon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think it was the battery backup units that are not audited. They have internet connectivity for updates and are hooked up to the computer that is the voting machine. They have more access than should be allowed, ideally none.

      I believe the company Tripp-Lite was implicated due to their owner being a Trump supporter.