Girls suing the school argued that at least 59 girls were traumatized by “an extended, catastrophic institutional failure.” They claimed that they “were forced to go to high school while ‘deepfake’ nude images of them were circulating within the school community,” and that appallingly, Lindsay Deibler-Wallace, assistant head of Upper School, took no action to protect them after telling parents that “boys will be boys.”
The victims alleged that the school never suspended the students even after “the LCDS upper school was in a state of acute panic and disruption related to the AI-generated images.” Instead, the school allegedly discouraged girls from going to police, while withholding information from parents and obstructing efforts to investigate the distribution of AI-generated child sex abuse materials (CSAM), such as by refusing to respond to detectives seeking a yearbook photo for comparison.
Two male students have since pleaded guilty to 59 felony counts of sexual abuse of children, and their victims are hoping the court will rule that LCDS was required to report the incident to police, both by law and by “reasonable institutional practice.”
I had commented specific actions before your other snide comment requesting it from me, but thanks for your derision here.
I’ve been trying to ask you questions about your opinion and all you’re doing is avoiding the conversation. I even said explicitly right from the beginning that I’m not asking leading questions. It feels like I’m pulling teeth just to get you to engage beyond a gut reaction to the headline. If you don’t want to talk about it why the hell did you post this?
I may not be engaging in conversation the way you’d prefer, but that doesn’t mean I’m not engaging in conversation at all.
I gave you a detailed answer and you were snotty with me. I don’t need to engage any more beyond that.
You gave an actual answer after you posted three comments either doing your best to avoid saying anything substantive or calling me obtuse for asking you to engage in a meaningful fashion. I responded to your one real comment and you down voted me and didn’t respond again. If that’s what conversation is to you then I have no interest in pursuing it further. Enjoy the one sentence surface level replies I guess
Yes I downvoted you, your reply was rude right off the bat.
Have a good one.
That didn’t art in good faith and since the first question it was a trap. He restraignzd the answer to only two subjects social/legal gnorong the moral where 90% of the problem réside. Hé did it consciously, and managed to make you react emotionally. You not alone being a kind person :).
A meanifull fashion, lol. After restraining the answer on two subject ignoring that human are not only defined by social of legal. Manipulation 101…
No you not you chose two aspect of a question of more than 2 aspect and act like you asked an unoriented question… Dude it is painful to see this low level of manipulation.