I’ve said since the kickoff, on [2023-10-10] when I first saw it, that the “Hamas is destroying Palestine” narrative was straight from Haaretz. Of course this was later vindicated by Hamas revealing they had foreknowledge of an Israeli offensive, not the other way around as enemy media claimed.

I find this very funny. Allegedly the other guy who runs this is off working on projects. Thing is he told me he was going on vacation right before that. One of these projects is getting rid of all the youtubers. This video was sitting there the whole time! Hello! Plus, BE just posted this.

So again you don’t need to assemble the dossier. Just wait for their reality to crumple into the black hole known as the Bab El-Mandeb strait. Also I’m done, everyone is acting scary online right now. I was told there would be africa news?

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    BE doesn’t say Hamas is destroying Palestine at all. This is the only 7 second out of context clip in an 1.5 hour long video. And a statement he’s literally walked back by himself months ago and admitted to be wrong on, without some harassment campaign demanding him to do so.

    Even people like Finkelstein who wrote books instead of doing online activism have made plenty of mistakes and taken far less extreme positions. Most “influencer” are no different than those writing lefty blogs or books in the end.

    An on purity testing he agrees as well https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDWubUPhVaQ

    • DJ Putler@lemmy.mlBannedBOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Sure we can come back to this if you like, if that isn’t enough for you to relinquish one parasocial relationship, let’s go through everything he’s ever said instead of the worst things. Let’s get into his tactics and what they all share, regardless of professed ideology. Wiki will be up soon (allegedly, and my DMs are not being answered, maybe I can write it on Walmart receipts and mail them out to all of you if silence persists). After all it’s nothing personal, sometimes it seems that way as an argument can be a good way to find your own blindspots. The objective is an infohazard that kills everyone who has ever watched any of these videos.

      I mean, if I wanted to get personal I would go into how he has wasted time on stalking the actually useful people I know. But he isn’t important, and neither are they. It’s gotta be about the structure or this is just a random ideological mugging on a website nobody visits.