• Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    How has X not been sued into the ground?

    I’m not a big fan of CSAM laws but this sseems pretty horrific

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      How has X not been sued into the ground?

      the president of the usa is a known child rapist and probably trafficker elected twice to office… do you really think anyone in the gov cares about child porn made by one of the president’s best buds AI?

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        14 days ago

        This has nothing to do with Trump

        X can be held liable regardless of what Trump may or may not be guilty of

        • Jhex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          liable before whom? the racist, hand picked by a pedophile, SCOTUS?

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            The supreme court only really decides matters if constitutional law. Furthermore, for a case to get to the supreme court you need a bunch of the lower courts to have conflicting rulings. The supreme court only hears a tiny amount of cases per year so I don’t see why this would reach the top.

            This would almost certainly be decided by a lower court. A ruling then could be appealed but unless there is something major in the case a decision by the lower court would stand.

            • Jhex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              until it’s apealed and SCOTUS rules that making chil porn is freedom o& speech for example…

    • Manjushri@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      It’s not just X, if you read the whole article.

      That report did not call out X or xAI, but it did suggest that it’s likely common for AI firms to avoid sharing information on AI CSAM that cops can use to make arrests. For another example, NCMEC noted that Amazon AI services submitted the vast majority of tips (1.1 million), and none of those tips gave “actionable information” that law enforcement could use to identify perpetrators.

      Emphasis mine. These companies are willfully hiding the identity of the perpetrators from the police, probably because of the fear of prosecution for their own culpability in the crimes. Honestly, this is really a massive conspiracy among AI companies to profit off of child sexual exploitation. Not only are they providing the means for the people to commit the crimes, they are actively hiding the identity of the perpetrators.

      Edited for formatting.