this contradiction always confused me. either way the official company is “losing a sale” and not getting the money, right?

  • Samsy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 months ago

    it will ultimately look like a copy, and each successive copy from that copy will look worse. This is of course true with forms of tape media and a lot of others. But it isn’t true of digital media, where I could share a bit-for-bit copy of data that is absolutely identical to the original.

    There is one exception: reposted memes, they are losing pixels more and more. /s

      • loobkoob@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        And also just websites compressing images without the user getting any input. A meme that goes from Facebook to Twitter to Reddit to Twitter to Tumblr to Reddit to here will likely be compressed every time it gets reuploaded. Most social media sites use some form of image compression.

        And it obviously doesn’t help that artefacts from compression are multiplicative.

        • Adalast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          This is why you use PNG or GIF formats. Lossless compression on the PNG side and a LUT on the GIF side. Nothing to get compressed since it is literally just a grid of numbers and a table with the hex codes.

          I really wish the social media companies and phone manufacturers would switch to PNG. So much better than JPG.

            • Adalast@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I know, is sad. Would love to see them converting the JPG to PNG. I do see a lot of images coming off here as GIF though, which Facebook doesn’t let me send to people because fuck Facebook.

              • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                10 months ago

                The storage demands between small compressed JPEG’s and decent quality PNG’s is massive. That’s a lot to ask of people who are self hosting this without any of us paying for it. Especially since 99% of the images loaded up here are one off jokes that are compressed versions from somewhere else already. Pretty clear example of “the juice isn’t worth the squeeze” IMO

                • ferret@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  If only google hadn’t decided to shit all over JXL. We could have lossless images with an excellent compression algorithm (at least better than the .zip style deflate png uses) at this very moment.