Worth noting if you are using their VPN services or Browser.

EDIT: Apparently, labelling them as far-right isn’t as clear-cut from an economic perspective, but they do hold many core identity politics that are common amongst far-right parties such as:

  • Voiced support for the idea of large-scale remigration on multiple occasions, even for Swedish-born immigrants: “Sweden belongs to the Swedes”
  • Supports Sweden leaving NATO
  • In favor of Sweden leaving the European Union in a so-called “Swexit”
  • Stated that Sweden should only support other countries on the condition that it benefits Sweden and that it has to be “Sweden first”
  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 days ago

    he’s co-ceo and his co-founder has publically stated that he finds it unacceptable, but that “it’s his money”. don’t really agree with that stance but point is this is still developing. they may let him go.

    • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      I don’t get why a person can donate that much to a political party. Should be illegal.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 days ago

        if you think that’s bad you’ll love the socdem party’s lottery business, which is the main source of income for sweden’s largest party and which they’ve managed to make illegal for any other party.

        • wizzor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Please tell me more, sounds like something that could only happen in Finland.

              • lime!@feddit.nu
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 days ago

                basically S and their youth wing get 45% of their total income from a subscription lottery service that has been running since the fifties. the state has a gambling monopoly but S says their lottery is technically not gambling. even if it’s not, it’s morally gray at best for a political organisation.