• Landmammals@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    10 months ago

    The worst part is, Netflix didn’t even mess up. All the content owners decided to pull their licenses and make their own Netflix. Now we have 200 streaming services.

    So I joined the party and made my own netflix. And not to toot my own horn, but it’s the best one.

    • KnightontheSun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well, they did mess up. That mistake was to make content of their own. This angered the other studios so they pulled content and here we are.

      • tristan@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I think the issue started long before that. Netflix always had issues with content owners licensing it for one country but not for others, or asking huge fees to license for multiple countries. They’d also limit which shows Netflix could have at any time.

        This meant Netflix had to manage many different catalogues for different regions and constantly cycle shows on and off just to make the content owners happy

        Once content owners started realising they could milk Netflix for all it had, Netflix really had to start making content to reduce its risk and dependence on other studios

        The issue is and always was corporate greed, on every level

      • The_v@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        There was multiple mess ups from many different places. Netflix making their own content was just an excuse.

        First off the government allowed consolidation of the studios. All of the buyout and mergers reduced the number of players.

        Netflix, video stores, and theatres before them were/are distributors. They did not create any products but acted as a local point of sale.

        A distributor only makes sense when the producers and customers have a high level of segmentation and they can’t economically or efficiently connect directly. When the producers are consolidated enough, cutting out a distribution network in an attempt to generate more profit is inevitable. It never works out as expected.

        In general the producers can not offer the level of service that the distributor did. So the customer always suffer from a decline in service. It also always becomes more expensive for the customer with shittier products. The producing companies try to make up for losses in revenue from sales with lower quality cheaper product.

        Now if the government had blocked the studio consolidation we would have likely have seen the rise of distributor competition. Distributor competition is very, very good for the consumer. When multiple companies are offering the same product but offering differing levels of service the consumer benefits.

        The producers if they are smart make the same amount of money from all of the distributors and focus on making high quality products they can sell at a premium.

      • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        They made their own content because Hulu was a partnership between 4 different content companies intended to screw Netflix out of money.