A hormone-free pill, called YCT-529, that temporarily stops sperm production by blocking a vitamin A metabolite has just concluded its first safety trial in humans, getting a step closer to increasing male contraceptive options

  • ryannathans@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    Medication non-adherence is a pretty big deal when it comes to contraception. This isn’t some chronic disease where a drop in efficacy can be tolerated or not noticed. Contraceptives need to have high efficacies, to the point where it is all but guaranteed to work. Not seeing results for months affects medication adherence

    • HyperCube@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 months ago

      House Season 4 Episode 5:

      (House to Cuddy) And I know when my Vicodin isn’t Vicodin. Do you know when your birth control pills aren’t birth control pills?

    • Solumbran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Horrible side effects are also a big issue and people don’t give much of a shit about that when it comes to female contraceptives.

      • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        They do. However, those side effects are being compared to the alternative - pregnancy can be a major health risk for a woman.

        Men don’t have that comparison to justify the side effects against.

        • Solumbran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          It takes two to make a baby.

          Putting the whole burden on the ones with ovaries (that are already a big fucking burden on their own) is absurd.

          • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m aware. I’m saying from the standpoint of medical science, that’s the benchmark being used.

            Organism 1 taking Med A causes health issues. Not taking Med A suffers no ill effects.

            Organism 2 taking Med B causes health issues. Not taking Med B could suffer worse I’ll effects.

            Approving Med A to be taken by Organism 1 in order to prevent Organism 2 from suffering ill effects…is not how medication testing is done.

            • Solumbran@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yes, but if at some point the benchmark being used is obviously, undoubtedly flawed on a matter that can be solved, then it’s time to ignore the benchmark.

              The medical sector is always loooving to make exceptions and ignore rules, but when it comes to women’s health suddenly the protocol is set in stone, that seems pretty convenient for a sector that is pretty well known to be extremely set in their sexist ways.

      • coronach@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I know someone that eventually went with an IUD because the various pills she tried made her feel extremely emotionally unstable. Really shitty situation.