LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Autism@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 个月前Neurodiverse problemspiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square112linkfedilinkarrow-up1886arrow-down110
arrow-up1876arrow-down1imageNeurodiverse problemspiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Autism@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 个月前message-square112linkfedilink
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·29 天前 Your argument here is the good’ol “but you get what they’re trying to say here?” You and test don’t exist in a vacuum: you can conjure context from your knowledge about the world.
minus-squareokamiueru@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·29 天前Not denying that. Do you think that is the argument here?
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·29 天前Point is - the question from test is good enough.
minus-squareokamiueru@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·28 天前If you only want answers from the type of people who can conjure this information, and do so in the same way, sure. What a weird thing to assume about the people answering the question, huh?
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·28 天前I mean, additional questions and struggle from the respondent are valuable insight by itself in this context.
You and test don’t exist in a vacuum: you can conjure context from your knowledge about the world.
Not denying that. Do you think that is the argument here?
Point is - the question from test is good enough.
If you only want answers from the type of people who can conjure this information, and do so in the same way, sure. What a weird thing to assume about the people answering the question, huh?
I mean, additional questions and struggle from the respondent are valuable insight by itself in this context.