• Fleur_@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    You’re watching them wrong! You’re not meant to watch old movies while half paying attention scrolling your phone. You lose out on so much of the movie that way! You have to watch them how the director intended. That is while half paying attention getting frisky with your date at the drive in.

  • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I think an element of being scared is surprise and the unknown.

    When something is done well it gets copied and becomes a cliche, then it’s no longer scary. Old movies are where the cliches come from, so revising them no longer packs the surprise and unknown from when they were first released. The movies you watch today might be scary, but in a few decades when they’ve been mimicked a few times they will no longer hold that potency.

    So, in a way, yes, older movies tend to no longer be scary. I think some of it is also learning the film making techniques. When we watch the behind the scenes of an actor in a suit, it makes the film lose some of that unknown.

  • CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I re-watched the Exorcist recently. I found it scary, but in a different way from how people try to sell it.

    The head turning, the vomit, the spider walking, that was all shocking (and cool) but not scary.

    What I did find scary was all the science/medicine stuff. Doctors telling the mother that Reagan is faking it, or keeping her under sedation, or subjecting her to endless invasive tests. The real horror is the mother’s realization that the material world cannot save her daughter. The horror of putting Reagan’s life in the hands of faith.

    So I’d say that it works on several levels, where for some people, scary is “OMG, a monster face!” and for others scary is the incomprehensible.

  • socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’m sorry, I just have the kind of autism where scary movies are either cringe or hilarious.

    • P00ptart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      2 days ago

      God I fucking hate jump scares. It’s such a cheap/lame way to do it. A good horror movie has 0 jump scares.

      • Zozano@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        One thing I loved about Longlegs is you’d give yourself mild jumpscares if you were paying attention.

        You need HDR to see the contrast between shadows, but you’ll see demons hiding in plain sight.

      • Naich@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        2 days ago

        Seven has 1 jump scare, and it is brilliant. But yes, a whole movie of them is just lazy.

  • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    2 days ago

    You do you. Alien aren’t scary but it’s intense and well made, and i only watched it recently. The Thing too. They both excel without relying on cheap jumpscare.

    • BurntWits@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I didn’t think I liked horror until I watched the original Alien. Now it’s up there for my favourite movie of all time. I’m still a bit nervous to branch out since I hate jump scares, but maybe I’ll check out the Thing. I’ve heard good things.

      • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You should, but do note it start up slow, once it get going it’s very well paced imo. it will also likely remind you of a popular game.

  • JayDee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Hard disagree about horror films and ‘scary movies’ needing to be ‘scary’. That’s an extremely subjective measure that just starts useless arguments.

    Just like any other film, what it actually needs is good writing, good acting, and good cinematography, parts which are more concrete than whether something’s scary. The horror part is essentially just an aesthetic which a movie can sit within.

    Also, quite often the view that ‘scary movies should be scary’ just leads to directors creating films that are hard to watch, period - full of vapid jumpscares, scenes made to just gross out the audience, and often just torture fetish content. It’s a terrible metric to aspire to that generally degrades the entire genre imo.

    • bufalo1973@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      If you think about it, one scary movie but not in the “normal” way is Schindler’s list.

      And a scary movie is a hunting movie seen from the POV of the prey.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Counterpoint: cinematography and story is more important to whether a movie is good than if it makes you jump

    The shining is not a particularly scary film by modern standards, it’s still rightly regarded as one of the best films of all time despite that

  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    You can just say that some horror movie simply isn’t your cup of tea.

    It’s not enviable if you can only enjoy horror movies if you’re surprised, but it’s valid to have that kind of taste.

    But Psycho and Alien are masterworks of tension in filmmaking (although Psycho is technically speaking a Thriller). And Evil Dead 2 is simply the perfect movie, so, this is my verdict on the meme:

    You make me sad

  • Da Bald Eagul@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    House isn’t scary at all, though it is scary that the director thought Hugh Laurie was more American than most Americans.

  • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s a failure of imagination on your part in some cases. In others the studio produced a confusing mess that might be scary if anyone could understand it.

  • Technus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Internet gives us access to the kind of depths of human depravity on a daily basis that most people wouldn’t have been exposed to in 1968, unless they had just gotten back from Vietnam.