The concept of “sabotage” here appears to include simply refusing to use AI.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    4 days ago

    If by “sabotaging” they mean “have not found a way to make it useful”, then I am included in the 29% as well

    • skarn@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      From the article:

      The sabotage entails entering proprietary information into public AI tools, or using unapproved AI tools. Some employees report outright refusing to use AI tools. Others have even admitted to tampering with performance reviews or intentionally generating low-output work to make AI appear less effective.

      So, I’d say, almost yes.

  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    This report comes from some no name company that also happens to be selling the same snake oil that the report is about. Just downvote this garbage and move on. Its been posted before and people called it out there too. Like i dont doubt that people are sabotaging AI and i would love if it were completely true, but this report just shouldnt be trusted.

    A new report published Tuesday from enterprise AI agent firm Writer and research firm Workplace Intelligence

    https://writer.com/

  • morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    i’ll resign the day they actively make me use this shit and will go baking cakes or do landscaping, whatever stuff ai will never be able to do

  • scoobford@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Yeah I work for a credit union pushing AI to process loan applications and replace training for retail staff.

    It’s so obvious that this is a terrible idea and yet everyone acts like you’re being a doomer if you say something so I just don’t use it because I know it’ll fuck up.