• EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I mean, they’re never gonna be finished if people don’t migrate to them and work on them. A lot of the wayland issues like “wayland breaks X” is because of the devs of said app rather than wayland itself. Kinda like adobe products and Linux, it ain’t linux that’s breaking them.

      • ADTJ@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah this thread is full of people expecting the new thing to immediately surpass the old, ignoring the decades of development and refinement that went into the old solution.

        • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I get that, I really do, but don’t try and push a product that isn’t usable for everyone to everyone. Sure, whoever wants to use it, they can, report bugs, open PRs, whatever, but don’t push this thing like it’s the second comming to everyone out there. One, not everyone needs the features it has, X11 works fine for most people. Two, it’s not backwards compatible, meaning they’d have to abandon a lot of software that just doesn’t work with it (waypipe doesn’t work all the time and with every piece of software there is).

          The transition is rushed, everyone feels that. Why? Because a lot of new features that new hardware had couldn’t be implemented in X11. And let’s be honest, this rushing to switch to Wayland is mostly because of gamers. Regarding a lot of things Linux related, they are the de facto standard that dictates whether somethings get’s changed or upgraded. I’m sorry, but not everyone is a gamer. Most people just need a working PC to do whatever. If you can’t be backwards compatible completely with the old UIs, I’m sorry, but that’s a deal breaker for me and I believe most regular users.

          • EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Xwayland is a thing, and nobody stops you from installing Xorg if you wanted. They’re just dropping official support so they can focus that energy to Wayland instead.

            Also not all Xorg features should be ported.

            I have found Wayland will work for 99% of users who aren’t gamers, all the major programs work well, ironically Wayland has been worse for gaming so far for me on the underpowered laptop, but that’s due to it having to run also through xwayland, which will be a problem solved by Valve pretty soon as they don’t have to worry about Xorg anymore and can make proton work better for Wayland.

            • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Tried Xwayland… jump through hoops to get something meant to be run on Wayland on X11… sorry, not for me. And it didn’t work in the end BTW, have no idea why.

              Though, I have to admit, this was over a year ago.

              Still, my stand point is, this is not a finished product no matter how you look at it. If you don’t have at least 90% of the stuff that are supposed to work, working, without major problems, then yes, but this is more like 50/50. Some things work, some don’t, we really have no idea what does and doesn’t… except Wayland and Nvidia of course, we know that doesn’t work.

              • drewofdoom@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Ummm… Sure… Progress takes time, and it won’t speed up at all if everyone says “it’s not ready,” and edge cases never get tested. I mean, the project is sixsteen years old now. It’s been more than just " pretty good" for years at this point.

                And I doubt that your distro is going to drop X11 session support anytime soon. So if you reinstall, you may need to do one more step to make that the default. Big whoop.

                But the real meat here is that you had a bad experience something like a year ago, and it seems like you’ve developed true hatred over it. Would it help to know that Nvidia and Wayland play nicely now? They have for quite some time.

                FWIW, I had very little trouble with xwayland even years ago. It didn’t really require any setup for me. It just kinda worked. Sure, there will always be SOME weirdness, but overall it’s been working really well for years.

                Anyways, I’m sure you can still toggle over to your X session for years to come. At least until your DE decides it wants to go wayland only.

                • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I just don’t like how every distro out there is pushy about it. Give us a choice, fine, but don’t make it the default.

                  My distro is not gonna drop support for X11 for a very long time. I’m not worried about that part.

                  Would it help to know that Nvidia and Wayland play nicely now?

                  Not according to what I’ve read. There were people complaining about Nvidia and Wayland in this thread as well.

                  And I don’t even own an Nvidia GPU, most of my GPUs are onboard, Intel.

                  • drewofdoom@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    TBH, it sounds like you should go with a distro that makes no assumptions. Like an Arch/Endeavor. It definitely sounds like you’re current distro doesn’t meet your needs/ideals if you’re this angry about a default change.

                    Let’s be fair to the distro maintainers, though. They have the option to either keep shipping and developing against abandoned code, or they move with upstream. Since no one is developing X11 anymore, they’re all moving to the new stuff. Most of them changed defaults years ago, too. Hard to develop new features when X is so long in the tooth.

                    The writing has been on the wall about the death of X11 for a long time, now. No one stepped up to fork it or take over maintenance. So it goes. But this is Linux, so you’re free to run it forever. Or even fork and maintain it yourself.

                    FWIW, Wayland+Nvidia was fine for me. Promising, even, considering how new it is. There are bugs to squash, sure, but there always are in new software.

    • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      do you really expect people, who do this work in their free time out of the goodness of their heart, to release fully finished products that are supposed to work 100% flawlessly right from the get-go? maybe FOSS isn’t the right space for you then.

      • 0x4E4F@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        There are projects that beg to differ. PipeWire, a perfect example. The author thought it wasn’t stable enough even though some distros addopted it as default. He switched to version 1.0 a few months ago.

        And I do also use non-FOSS software. I use whatever I like, I don’t discriminate, FOSS or not. Sure, it’d be great if every piece of software was open source, but hey, things are what they are 🤷. DaVinci Resolve is closed source, but there are a lot of things NLE video editors can learn from it.

          • Falcon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            From the first result on Google:

            The Wayland Display Server project was started by Red Hat developer Kristian Høgsberg in 2008

            So yeah, I suspect Red Hat does in some way contribute to development. As I’m sure does Microsoft, Canonical etc.

            None of this happens in a vacuum.

            • silly goose meekah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              This is what I found:

              Wayland is developed by a group of volunteers initially led by Kristian Høgsberg

              I can’t deny that maybe some larger company allocated resources to the project, even if, to me, it seems like no large company is directly funding the project right now, and Kristian seems like he hasn’t really participated in the development of wayland for the past year or so. The fact remains that it’s a FOSS project and you aren’t a paying customer, so IMO it’s kinda ridiculous to complain about it not being perfect right away. Work on improving it if you think it’s so bad.