• ramasses@social.ozymandias.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 个月前

    Because the ubuntu edition is just sypware (thanks canonical). Linux is great, but their are good and bad choices to be made

        • LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 个月前

          I don’t have a horse in the race, because Linux anything is better than the alternatives but I do think its funny that this infographic says Ubuntu has pushed malware through apt, but makes no mention of the XZ backdoor for Debian

        • Zombie@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 个月前

          Thank you for the sources. However, from your own source Mint appears to be fine. Ubuntu, agreed, isn’t worth touching but Mint seems to remove the problems with Ubuntu.

          4 If you are a desktop user who values control and simplicity — consider migrating: Linux Mint, Pop!_OS, Fedora, and Debian all offer compelling alternatives without Snap’s structural issues. The migration cost is real but one-time; the ongoing friction of managing Snap on Ubuntu compounds with every package and every update.

          5 If you recommend distros to others — update your recommendation: Developers who previously defaulted to “just install Ubuntu” when helping friends or onboarding team members should now give this advice more thought. Linux Mint in particular offers a nearly identical user experience to Ubuntu’s classic desktop with none of the Snap-related friction.

    • mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 个月前

      None of it seems to suggest it’s spyware. I agree they do bad practices but spyware? C’mon

      Also linux mint(the ububtu based one) also removes snaps and everything. How can you say anything like that about mint then?