• schmidtster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    That’s a placebo affect. Most generics are stuff that don’t meet the standards of the name brand, but is still fine to sell. Kind of a form of downcycling.

    • frickineh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I don’t know that placebo is the right word (or if you just pulled that info out of your ass) but even if it was, if people consume the generic and just feel like it was the same, then who cares? It’s not like people are buying Kirkland chemotherapy, it’s some cookies or lotion or whatever, and our feelings about those things are totally subjective anyway.

      • burchalka@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        And even with medicine - not sure about cancer treatments, but headaches cured fine with generic ibuprofen vs more expensive Nurofen™ or similar

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      There’s way WAY too many generic and store brands for them all to just be QC rejects.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        They’re not. I have celiac, and I’ve learned from reading labels that they often have completely different ingredients/manufacturing conditions.

        They’re not QC rejects, but they’re also not the same thing repackaged.

          • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            My provider claims generics can have different fillers and such. The active ingredients have to be the same, though.

            If I really wanted to be sure, I’d ask a pharmacist.

            • vrek@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Yeah that’s my understanding too but it’s like preferring McDonald’s over McBurger because they get the bag from a different distributor

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Usually it is just cheaper ingredients but made in the same factory, and branded with a different label.

          • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            See, this is what people say, but now that I’ve been reading labels I don’t believe it.

            For example, I cannot eat Kellogg’s Rice Krispies, but some off brands are made with a different formula that doesn’t include gluten and is manufactured in a safe environment.

            Conversely, I can eat Cheerios, but not most store brands, Lucky Charms but not most store brands, etc.

            And that’s just cereal! Even drugs vary wildly. Sure, the active ingredients are the same, but the other contents can really vary.

            Some foods have similar ingredients, but are either manufactured on shared equipment with wheat and dairy, or not.

            I now believe that most store brands are made in a unique environment. I’m open to being convinced otherwise, but if you need more examples, I can check my cupboard and tell you all kinds of things!

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s more common that they’re made by factories during what otherwise would be their downtime, like a production run wedged in at night.