• voracitude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think in this context “disposable” means “this free email address is now blocked, and there is no bar to simply creating another account for continued spamming”.

        If the list includes Gmail for this, I don’t think there’s a sound argument for excluding Proton.

        • EmperorHenry@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s no sound argument for not allowing people to be anonymous online anywhere, except for banking websites and maybe a few other things involving your identity information.

    • NateSwift@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not sure why you’re getting downvoted.

      The maintainer seems to group and email you can get without paying for as “disposable” and includes gmail as one of those

      • misophist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure, either. I assume they’re offended that I may be bad-mouthing their favorite email provider, which I’m really not.