I’ve been reading about the user revolt on the Twin Peaks subreddit calling for a ban on AI art. As best I can tell we don’t really have people posting AI stuff here yet, but I’m wondering if it would be a good idea to ban it before it becomes a problem. I’m soliciting feedback from y’all on this, please let me know what you prefer.

  • Kichae@wanderingadventure.party
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 个月前

    Believe it or not, you can release written content without professional art. Used to be done all the time. Deciding you want to skip ahead in your progress as a publisher and use tools that have been built off the back of unconsenting contributors doesn’t entitle you to someone’s platform.

    • INeedMana@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 个月前

      Yes, one can do that. But, probably because of how content ( in broad meaning) works, it’s not being done. That’s why I’m afraid such rule would mostly cut out the small-fries

      • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 个月前

        What makes you say it’s not being done? Where are you somehow finding a lack of content?

        There’s free tools, maps, oneshots, entire games with 1-2 page rulesets being posted online all the time that aren’t utilizing AI. All for free. The TTRPG community is bursting with content.

        • INeedMana@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 个月前

          Mostly stuff that is not fantasy and not a spaceship

          I don’t suppose I see all that is happening in modern+ RPG branch (niche?). But I do support a few creators on Patreon, I follow a few creators on DTRPG, I follow a bunch of blogs. And I see all walks of AIGen

          • things without AIGen that look well good for the creators that they are able to do the content AND a cover image/presentation
          • things without AIGen that look poor but the content is good I would not hold it against the creators to try improve the looks with AIGen. I know that this is the point we don’t agree on, I just wanted to point this out
          • things with AIGen that have good contents clearly the creators like from the previous point but after taking that decision
          • things with AIGen that IMO are crap yeah, this is a waste of everything

          That’s why I’m more in “let downvotes tell the story” camp. Because in the end it’s not the use of AIGen that makes a thing bad. It’s the decision of the creator that “this is good enough”. And without covering the bad stuff too, we are just sweeping it under the rug