Nom Nom Nom…

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    An important reminder is that Kimmel’s monologue did not say anything slightly negative about Charlie Kirk’s demonic zionazi and replacement theorgy genocidal supremacism. He only made fun of Trump for interviews in which he was asked about any sympathy he had for his dead dear friend, getting deflect-weaved into “we’re building the bestest ballroom in the white house now”.

      • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 days ago

        He didn’t even say that though, this is driving me insane, he said that Trump and them were doing everything they could to pin the blame on the left and score political points from it, which is undeniable. He didn’t say anything about who he actually thought the shooter was.

        • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          He literally said that the right is “desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them”.

              • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                How do you interpret it any way other than what it says? You are making an assumption if you interpret it differently than what he clearly stated.

                • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  I read it as him saying that the shooter was unquestionably right wing, which is different than saying that the right wing is desperate to prove that it’s anyone else.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        He implied it but he straight up was factually saying they’re trying real hard to show it wasn’t one of their guys. It definitely wasn’t any of the people MAGA wanted to pin it on.

        Turns out it was some kind of apolitical zoomer whose friends were personally affected by Kirk’s rhetoric likely because the problem with living in the most conservative US state is that a lot of people around you are probably repeating the vitriol.

        There’s still a decent good case to be made that MAGA bullied this kid into killing Kirk by threatening people he loves.

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            He lives in Utah. My uncle who had parkinsons would watch fox news all day and thought trans ISIS was going to invade his house in 2019. I can’t imagine how difficult it is for anyone othered by these media cartels is in states where people are heavily enthralled.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        The 2 candidates are Bill Ackman or Nick Fuentes “influence”. That Carr, Trump, Sinclair need to protect one of those 2 shows how corrupt democracy is.

        Next election needs to promise to nationalize with no compensation all zionazi media, zeroing out all directors and exectutives wealth, decitizenize any politician pledging allegiance to Israel, zeroing out all of their donors, and nationalize defense and oil industry.