• DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      It also means that you will only see the downvotes from your instance. So I would not be able to see your downvotes, because you are from kbin.social.

      If you are on a large instance, like lemmy.world, you’ll still see a lot of downvotes.

    • blindsight@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m on Beehaw, which doesn’t allow downvotes. If you downvote any of my comments on Beehaw I’ll literally never know unless I log in from another instance. Beehaw also won’t federate your downvotes to other instances, either, so only other users on the same instance will see them.

      It’s a pretty great system, imho. Downvotes haven’t been useful since Digg collapsed and Rediquette went out the window.

        • blindsight@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Felt weird typing it, too. It’s okay to talk about Rediquette on Lemmy as ancient history from 12 (?) years ago, right?

    • Deebster@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Downvotes are disabled on Beehaw, and I believe that downvotes from other instances don’t federate - i.e. they’re only visible on the instance the user downvoted from. If you’re on a massive instance and you view a popular community you’ll still get “useful” numbers of downvotes but otherwise it’ll mostly be upvotes.

      I think Lemmy does need a more nuanced downvote system (e.g. you need to select a reason or there’s a quota or something), but I’m not sure how it’d work with the wider fediverse.

      Edit: I should have scrolled more, two people had already written this comment).