ElCanut to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 2 years agoOh no ...external-linkmessage-square333linkfedilinkarrow-up11.84Karrow-down1110
arrow-up11.73Karrow-down1external-linkOh no ...ElCanut to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square333linkfedilink
minus-squareBaut [she/her] auf.@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 years agoX’ architecture is insecure. There’s no isolation between windows, and each process can spy on your input. That’s just one example. Wayland is necessary.
minus-squareExLisper@linux.communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 years agoYet no known active exploits use this insecure architecture to cause actual harm. It’s just another FUD.
minus-squareBaut [she/her] auf.@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoI’d hardly call that an exploit. There’s no protection.
X’ architecture is insecure. There’s no isolation between windows, and each process can spy on your input. That’s just one example.
Wayland is necessary.
Yet no known active exploits use this insecure architecture to cause actual harm. It’s just another FUD.
I’d hardly call that an exploit. There’s no protection.