• curiousaur@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You did not answer my question. You gave a definition of natural. Please explain why you get to define it.

    • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      As explained, I clarified the sense for which I invoked the term.

      Beyond seeking such an answer, your question is not particularly coherent. No right is being asserted.

      • curiousaur@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nothing that you’ve written has been remotely coherent, it’s comical that you’d even use that word.

        Have you ever been diagnosed with a mental illness by chance? Do you ever hear voices or feel intrusive thoughts?

        • unfreeradical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Every skill is different from every other qualitatively.

          Skills are not related by any natural ranking from their intrinsic attributes.

          Their distribution across society is not a natural consequence of their intrinsic attributes, but rather results from processes that are social, relating to accessibly and desirability for individuals receiving training.

          Social processes are not natural, because they occur in society, not in nature.

          I am sorry that you are feeling confused as you try to follow, but further simplification would be impossible.