• TronBronson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Bro you already have anarchy, trump has turned the USA into a lawless place. This is it chief. Enjoy.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      anarchism is the dissolution of the state and its monopoly on violence, not the dissolution of law. an anarchic society can have a law but no state, but a state and no law is a dictatorship

      • Shayeta@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        In a society with equally distributed power of violence you wouldn’t have laws, but mere loose agreements. It is the monopoly on violence that gives one the authority to impose laws.

        • Match!!@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          given the way real world “monopolies” on violence work, i would contend that true law has never existed

            • Match!!@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              mostly this is a joke about the phrase “true communism has never been tried”: “true law”, a state that fully enforces and abides by the law, has never been tried

        • 反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Laws which are used to oppress the poor, and not the colonists extracting wealth from other nations.

          Your statist propaganda machine worked so well, that you have people confusing anti oppression tools with oppression tools. Hurrah for European Neoliberalism, Hurrah!

          • Shayeta@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            What? Laws are whatever those in power make them. Oppressive vs anti-oppressive is a matter of perspective. Oppressive is what oppresses my side, anti-oppressive is what oppresses the opposing side.

            Sure, any society will eventually degrade into the owning class squeezing the working class dry, and society as a whole has short memory leading to cycles of bloody oppression and bloody revolution.

                • 反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  20 hours ago

                  You’re dialecting me about oppression. I’m Q.E.D. how bolt cutters can be used to dialect oppression.

                  Your last sentence seems to be a fascist quote of some sort, because Anarchists reject the notion of “society” and murder.

                  • 0xD@infosec.pub
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    19 hours ago

                    God fucking damn dude, I’m generally on your side, but you’re just one of the short-sighted morons playing right into the fash’s hands giving this stuff a bad name. Just shut up, mate.

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ya, I know. I’ve just never been able to join you in the presumption that law can exist without a state. That’s where property rights come from. That’s where the mediums of exchange come from. At the end of the day someone’s in charge of making rules and enforcing them. At the family level up to a national level; and perhaps even a global level. I admire programs like USaid and see the value of governments. If there ever was a time to gain support for those ideas it would be now. I just want the government I had 4 months ago to come back.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          And at this point I should chime in and note that the meaning of “state” in anarchist theory is not the dictionary one – taking wikipedia:

          A state is a political entity that regulates society and the population within a definite territory

          Other societies have states, anarchist societies are states, by that definition. (Just for the record fascism is the unity of capital and state, not society and state).

          Rather, the Anarchist definition formed under the influence of monarchical and bourgeois authoritarianism. Redoing the terminology and using “hierarchy” or something is way overdue IMNSHO: Continuing to use an unexpected definition of “state” causes lots of confusion, provides no clarity, thus hinders praxis, and as the theoretical and practical purpose of theory is to bolster praxis it has to go.

          Also makes explaining why Ancaps aren’t Anarchist way easier.

          “In your stateless society, who will collect the garbage?” – “The municipalities, just as they do now, I guess” – “Didn’t you just say you want to abolish the state?” – “Yes the municipality will not be a state any more” – “You’re stupid and should feel stupid I’m voting for the fascists at least the garbage gets collected on time”.

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        No lol, just knew lots of Anarchists and communists growing up. Oh and the ‘Fight a Tyranical Government’ Libertarians. What are you guys up to these days? You seen the other two around?

          • TronBronson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Sorry for assuming you were a weeb that was very rude. I also did not know they were Japanese anarchist so that is an exciting revelation. Carry-on brother. That must be a true oddity in your culture.

              • TronBronson@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                17 hours ago

                I spent about 3 months traveling between Tokyo and Kagoshima. Even made it to Okinawa and that small island south of Kagoshima. I really appreciate the hospitality that was extended to me the whole time I was there. You guys are truly wonderful nation full of beautiful people history and scenery. Did not meet a single anarchist there, except maybe a French traveler I spent a lot of time drinking with.

                  • TronBronson@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    11 hours ago

                    I spent my days in museums and spent my nights drinking at dodgy bars talking to people about all sorts of things. I don’t really set out to meet any types of people but I met all types in Japan. Got very drunk with a heart surgeon in Kagoshima. You guys are not politically outspoken so I wouldn’t assume anyone’s politics. Most of the conversations were around Japanese history, American culture and food.