That sentence still makes it sound like you think the US has been unilaterally directing western colonialism, but European nations have independently taken the initiative on that quite a bit
It’s ridiculing the lack of agency European countries chose to have when being pulled into various wars and missions with the US. The comment additionally starts off with “We (the west)”. If Europe doesn’t belong to “the west”, then where do they belong to?
That sentence takes away agency from those European “vassals”. The British and French empires still exist to this day. They conduct their own foreign policy and are in charge of their own internal security and territorial integrity.
The person you’re responding to is absolutely right.
Well, no - they definitely don’t still exist. Their marks are still left on the places they once subjugated, sure, but they definitely do not exist anymore.
Tell that to northern Ireland, Scotland, Gibraltar, French Guiana or Polynesia.
Both countries still have overseas territories all over the world. It doesn’t matter how hard you, they or anyone else tries to legitimize those colonies, that’s still what they are.
Why were the French using the Polynesian islands as nuclear testing grounds up through 1996? Would the French government be so lax with testing in their own country? No - that’s why they did it in a colony with 200,000 brown people instead.
Literally the sentence above it
That sentence still makes it sound like you think the US has been unilaterally directing western colonialism, but European nations have independently taken the initiative on that quite a bit
It’s ridiculing the lack of agency European countries chose to have when being pulled into various wars and missions with the US. The comment additionally starts off with “We (the west)”. If Europe doesn’t belong to “the west”, then where do they belong to?
That sentence takes away agency from those European “vassals”. The British and French empires still exist to this day. They conduct their own foreign policy and are in charge of their own internal security and territorial integrity.
The person you’re responding to is absolutely right.
Funny how you are able to use hyperbole without recognising it yourself.
Well, no - they definitely don’t still exist. Their marks are still left on the places they once subjugated, sure, but they definitely do not exist anymore.
Tell that to northern Ireland, Scotland, Gibraltar, French Guiana or Polynesia.
Both countries still have overseas territories all over the world. It doesn’t matter how hard you, they or anyone else tries to legitimize those colonies, that’s still what they are.
Why were the French using the Polynesian islands as nuclear testing grounds up through 1996? Would the French government be so lax with testing in their own country? No - that’s why they did it in a colony with 200,000 brown people instead.