SomeoneElse@lemmy.worldM to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world · 3 years agoYou probably don’t need a masters degree to debunk this one.lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square80linkfedilinkarrow-up1113arrow-down12
arrow-up1111arrow-down1external-linkYou probably don’t need a masters degree to debunk this one.lemmy.worldSomeoneElse@lemmy.worldM to Confidently Incorrect@lemmy.world · 3 years agomessage-square80linkfedilink
minus-squarePiecemakers@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·3 years agoAre you equating the nuance of a timeless literary classic to a sheltered white guy’s childhood? For real?
minus-squareZombiepirate@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 years agoNo, I’m saying that if you ask someone to summarize a lengthy piece then it’s a bit ridiculous to complain about the lack of details.
minus-squarePiecemakers@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·3 years agoYes, and I’m starting that if you attempt to summarize, do be sure to touch on key points rather than boiling it down to such a degree that it’s indistinguishable from mud. Pretty basic stuff, friend. Thanks for trying, though.
Are you equating the nuance of a timeless literary classic to a sheltered white guy’s childhood? For real?
No, I’m saying that if you ask someone to summarize a lengthy piece then it’s a bit ridiculous to complain about the lack of details.
Yes, and I’m starting that if you attempt to summarize, do be sure to touch on key points rather than boiling it down to such a degree that it’s indistinguishable from mud. Pretty basic stuff, friend. Thanks for trying, though.