Daft_ish@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 1 year agoThey use to tell us we couldnt trust Wikipedia. Now we know. Wikipedia is the only website you can trust.message-squaremessage-square330fedilinkarrow-up11.18Karrow-down1120
arrow-up11.06Karrow-down1message-squareThey use to tell us we couldnt trust Wikipedia. Now we know. Wikipedia is the only website you can trust.Daft_ish@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square330fedilink
minus-squareDauntingFlamingo@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoThat is wildly inaccurate and you know it. There are like 6.5 million articles on Wikipedia and the majority (since people are pedantic, we’ll say 50.1%) are well cited and accurate
minus-squarezephyreks@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoHave you looked at what’s considered a valid “source” on Wikipedia? The fact that there’s an odd good article does not make the site a reliable source of anything.
That is wildly inaccurate and you know it. There are like 6.5 million articles on Wikipedia and the majority (since people are pedantic, we’ll say 50.1%) are well cited and accurate
Have you looked at what’s considered a valid “source” on Wikipedia?
The fact that there’s an odd good article does not make the site a reliable source of anything.