• tiramichu@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Or, the other way of looking at it, prices are not impossibly low like we have come to expect from disposable fashion produced by exploited workers in slavery conditions.

    • Lifekraft
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      I try mostly to buy my cloth from europe only for already quite long time and im very happy about this recent incensitive that will probably boost offer. But. There is two things that are a little bit irritating with EU clothing : the price and quality are way too high for lower middle class , i work , get dirty , sweat , i dont want to ruin a 500€ cashmire/welsh magical goat wool because my activity arnt excusively sunday brunch and art gallery opening. And omg , the fashion choice is insane too , i dont want to look like a berliner or parisian urban hipster when walking my dog or shopping in aldi.

      They need more regular fashion and more reasonnable quality/pricing. I dont mind paying 100 euro for a jean for example but as someone wearing cap , its either i will look like a clown with their design or i need to pay 400 euro.

      • return_void@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Completely understood and i agree that it is a bit irritating to put a lot of money on cloths and get them scratched the next day ! I try to buy the same and honestly shop a lot on https://www.wedressfair.fr/ lately. The brand colorful standard makes stuff that lasts long enough for me and that is pretty classic stuff, no hipster style necessary.

      • 0xD@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        You could take a look at something like Asket? I recently got two t-shirts from them, and I love how they are simple and elegant. They only have one “essentials” collection and also are cheaper than others like merzbschwanen or something.

        I cannot say anything about their longevity yet, unfortunately.

    • Blaze@feddit.nlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      Definitely, but everytime clothing made in Europe is posted here, the top comments are usually about how expensive they are

      • superkret@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        True, but there’s an easy solution:
        Don’t buy new clothes.
        You probably already have more than enough.

        • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Or buy used clothes at thrift stores

          Clothes stay good for a good while if not abused, buying second hand is a fantastic way of reducing waste

          • superkret@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’m part of a clothes sharing group, and the amount of never-worn or like-new high quality clothing people just give away for free is incredible.

      • 0xD@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        They are more expensive but at least don’t have sweat of children and lead on them.

  • Señor Mono@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    The prices are the way they are because it is real wool, which doesn’t grow on trees. If I take a look at other wool pullovers/sweaters from other companies they range from 80-130€ some peeking at about 200€.

    So it is that particular material and thus product, not the company that is pricy.

    • ramble81@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      So I don’t quite get your “grow on trees” analogy. They just grow on sheep instead, and require harvesting like they would from a tree, and require food and care like trees. And it’s not like you’re killing them off. So if anything, it’s almost exactly like “growing on trees”

      • Señor Mono@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Cotton is cheaper. It grows on trees plants, which implicate better availability and easier procurement.

        • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Despite it’s German name Baumwolle, cotton doesn’t grow on trees, like e.g. Kapok does, but on annually cultivated plants which makes it faster to grow, scalable and easier to harvest.

          • Señor Mono@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Okay. Plants instead of trees. It was a false friend, thanks for pointing out. Striked tree out for good measure.

    • RidderSport@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Maybe, but frankly he’s often very wrong about German bureaucracy, mostly the law. A good lawyer could have avoided many of his problems

      • eneff@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, even though many of his points are valid, he’s being a prick about the whole situation and making many things way harder for himself (and his employees) than they’d need to be IMO.

    • XM34@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oh, that’s the guy? Yeah, no thanks. He went onto an hour long rant because the state wouldn’t accept his DIY scaffolding as an emergency exit.

  • jnerk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have no problem paying more if the quality is good and the manufacturing is ethical and sustainable.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Me too, the problem is, there is no way to judge quality effectively until you wear the clothes for a long time.

      Just because it is made here in the EU, doesn’t mean it is good quality. Tons of shit quality at a high price things exist.

      For example couches. There are plenty of 5000€ couches that sink and degrade as fast or faster than ikea 500€ couches. It is a crapshoot for finding actual good quality like couches used to be.

  • experiencetheworld@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    But if you wear the clothes as long as possible you the prices maybe are quite fine. When you buy the pullover for 175€ you can wear it for 5 to maybe 10+ years. Also your money stays in Europe, when more people buy from them the prices will go down, you buy high quallity clothes, … So I guess it’s fine.

  • Jrockwar@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    You say “as expected” but on the opposite end of the spectrum there’s primark’s clothing which is largely made in Ireland. From my understanding the reason they are dirt cheap is because they lean on automation, not because of sweatshops.

    Not comparing the two brands - just showing the opposite example to say it’s possible to have brands that are both European AND cheap. European doesn’t necessarily mean crazy expensive.

    • eneff@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      there’s primark’s clothing which is largely made in Ireland

      What makes you think that? Only two of the 793 factories Primark sources its products from are in Ireland and only eight of them are in the EU. (Source)

      because they lean on automation, not because of sweatshops

      Just have a look at this or this.