• FrChazzz@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I feel like the majority of people I see quit Mastodon do so because the platform (and Federation in general) don’t coddle their egos. With no algorithm to game and ingratiate themselves on everyone’s timelines, they make a public exit and talk about how broken Mastodon is and offer their takes on what it needs to be. Which, unsurprisingly, sounds like a non-Elon-ed Twitter.

    I love Mastodon. I love discovering new people and accounts by happenstance (and not spoon-feeding).

    • ArtificialHoldings@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      From a content creation standpoint, it does kind of suck. There’s no ego about it. The system doesn’t carry your content to nearly as many eyes, even accounting for the reduced audience. Discovery and suggestion algorithms are extremely effective, and if I’m trying to get my stuff to reach as much of my audience as possible, I wouldn’t only be on Mastodon. I’m not just talking about mediocre content either - even extremely motivating stuff in the niche doesn’t generate even a small fraction of engagement as regular social media sites.

      For some people, this is a benefit - it’s a poorly commodified system. For small content creators trying to build an audience and generate paid subscribers, it’s not enough. Most creators on Fediverse are contributing as a free or non-profit hobby.

      • synicalx@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I’d prefer for my social media to not be full of ads for “content”.

    • Marleyinoc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      I didn’t know it was so old. I joined in Nov 2022 and check it about as much as I check any social media. I don’t really post and just boost here and there.

      Edit: Now that bluesky is (seemingly) taking off, I wonder how much of a chance it has to survive.

      • FrChazzz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Bluesky is still pretty centralized and venture-capital backed. There’s been discussions about monetization. It’s only a matter of time before it enshittifies.

    • technohippie@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      We may have to just accept that it won’t ever be a big platform for this very reason and just have fun there as a niche site.

      • FrChazzz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I would be totally fine with that tbh. Though I wonder if we’ll ever get to the place where a Mastodon client somehow incorporates an algorithmic timeline for those who want that?

    • SpicyColdFartChamber@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Yup, that’s a major reason why people didn’t want to leave twitter. They’d built a following that they didn’t want to rebuilt.

      I know people who hated elon Musk and had accounts on other microblogging platforms, but continued to post on twitter because that’s where they got their fill of engagement.

      Shifting away from reddit to lemmy is fundamentally easier than it is from Twitter to mastadon. I think it’s part in due to the nature of the type of social media platforms they are.