• Greyghoster@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    I have 30km there and 30km back from the from the shops on country roads. An electric car seems a safer and more practical way to encourage a change in my circumstances.

    • 8uurg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      That is only really a good solution for the few that live in the countryside. If sufficiently many people live close enough to one another without a shop, that is a issue that is best solved by improving planning and introducing local shops (reducing the distance all people in the community have to travel).

      • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        There is also a social engineering aspect. Our populations and cities have been developed in a spread out fashion with services and shops established in hubs. They aren’t the villages of the early 1900s. The car was the major design influence, hence the problem. Some people are lucky and can walk, others are able to cycle however many just can’t conceive anything other than a car. That’s where EVs come in.

          • Greyghoster@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            The relevance is the difficulty in convincing people who live in cities designed for car traffic to stop driving and start walking. Distances are large enough to get significant push back.

            • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              The cities need a glow up first. But it’s more than just an infrastructure problem. To my knowledge there’s no laws requiring grocery store chains to not have a monopoly or not be hella far away