DRM prevents you from downloading copies of books you've purchased from online storefronts, but is it legal to bypass DRM to create backups? Cory Doctorow, an expert on the DMCA, weighs in on the subject.
Title from the article. Interesting article, with some good words from our DRM-free favorite Cory Doctorow.
The fact that something like this is illegal undermines the rule of law. People get so used to breaking it they don’t respect the institutions which then have less power.
I’m all for this but some folks with a fetish for hierarchy seem to have a problem with it.
I think it’s more intended to (a) prevent casual piracy, and (b) to provide a legal stick for the cases where people do things like break-and-resell.
Don’t get me wrong; I have no illusions about the industry. If they could figure out a way to reasonably eliminate all “ownership” and charge you per read; or, better yet, charge you a recurring fee whether you read or not (hello, subscription services), they would. If there are circles of hell, most of these people would find themselves in the fourth.
However, I think it’s only worth the effort of prosecuting for gross violations, and probably few people in the companies care about folks de-DRMing their books, as long as they aren’t sharing them. It’s not hard to break the DRM, but it does require more knowledge and effort than, say, my mom is going to bother with.
The DMCA is still a stupid law, and should be repealed. This age of “you don’t own something you buy; you only rent it” is the ultimate stage of capitalism where it becomes almost impossible to defend.
The fact that something like this is illegal undermines the rule of law. People get so used to breaking it they don’t respect the institutions which then have less power.
I’m all for this but some folks with a fetish for hierarchy seem to have a problem with it.
I think it’s more intended to (a) prevent casual piracy, and (b) to provide a legal stick for the cases where people do things like break-and-resell.
Don’t get me wrong; I have no illusions about the industry. If they could figure out a way to reasonably eliminate all “ownership” and charge you per read; or, better yet, charge you a recurring fee whether you read or not (hello, subscription services), they would. If there are circles of hell, most of these people would find themselves in the fourth.
However, I think it’s only worth the effort of prosecuting for gross violations, and probably few people in the companies care about folks de-DRMing their books, as long as they aren’t sharing them. It’s not hard to break the DRM, but it does require more knowledge and effort than, say, my mom is going to bother with.
The DMCA is still a stupid law, and should be repealed. This age of “you don’t own something you buy; you only rent it” is the ultimate stage of capitalism where it becomes almost impossible to defend.