• comfy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    I dont think its good, but its people right to have the leader they choose.

    Well, that’s all well and good in an idealistic liberalist abstract, but in reality it often leads to (and Romania’s own history did lead to) mass suffering, extermination of minorities, and getting invaded and occupied by the Soviet Union after their fascist leader Codreanu allied with Hitler. So, it’s best nipped in the bud, no matter what the majority believe.

    Șoșoacă, in fact, is under investigating for commemorating Codreanu in public.

    • Bloomcole@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They fully deserved to be invaded by the Soviets.
      They had a fascist regime indeed. Don’t go crying about the consequences of their own actions.
      And you only believe in democracy when it turns out how you want?
      Looks like fake democracy to me if they let them participate and then ban them AFTER they win.
      It’s exactly what the US did when they held ‘democratic elections’ in Afghanistan.
      The Taliban won despite all their meddling after which they annuled it and had to do it over again without them.

      What will happen in other countries, let’s say if the horrible AfD win in Germany, are they going to ban them then?
      Either you ban them before or honor the results.
      But that would break the illusion of having a real democracy.
      It’s clear only centrist results in the narrow overton window are tolerated.
      And you think it was better for Georgia when they basically got a French president puppet or that corrupt one who had to flee to fascist ukraine where he had to flee again for doing the same?
      They literally started a war with Russia.
      And somehow the west doesn’t mind extreme right when they are against Russia.
      They fully suported them in ukraine, turned out great for them didn’t it?