• Romanmir@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m pretty sure that’s a state-by-state thing. I’m also pretty sure that some states already have some term limits.

      • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You would be right on both counts.

        That being said, term limits for members of Congress to solve anything is one of those things that sound good on the surface but could actually make everything even worse.

        It’s supposed to decrease corruption by incumbents being less entrenched, but it could be the cause of much MORE corruption by making the revolving door between corrupt business interests and corrupt politics spin faster…

        • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Could just add in sensible term limits of like 10-20 years. Also not allow them to own stock

          • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Except the first one wouldn’t work, for the reason described above.

            Banning them from holding stock would probably help a lot, though. Too bad that it won’t happen as long as oil boy Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi’s even more corrupt protégé are the Dem leaders of the two Chambers and their Republican counterparts continue to be even worse 😮‍💨

          • Blackmist@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Or at least not individual stocks.

            Having a bog standard market tracker would be fine.

          • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, exactly!

            IMO, ranked choice voting, publicly (and only publicly) funded elections and outlawing partisan and otherwise discriminating gerrymandering would be much better solutions.

            Will probably never happen though, since the people in charge of reforming the system are themselves amongst the main beneficiaries of the corruption inherent in the system 🤦