• kat_angstrom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This is the dumbest branding exercise ever. There are no additional “freedoms” that you can get in a corporate-run city versus a regular city; except that perhaps the corporation has more freedom to trounce upon the rights of the citizenry.

    If the future that Curtis Yarvin and his type envision starts to shape up, we’re gonna need to go full, 100% anti-corporation to push back.

    • except that perhaps the corporation has more freedom to trounce upon the rights of the citizenry.

      That is exactly the kind of freedom they are looking for, and don’t underestimate the psychology there - it feels like freedom to them, the kind of freedom that allows for injustices to prevail. I’m reminded of an anecdote of Ẑiẑek, talking to a bunch of fascists in former Yugoslavia, where they in no uncertain terms revealed, that it had been tyranny to them to not be able to be violent, rape, plunder, etc. and that the chaos of the breakup had been a liberatory event for them, psychologically.

      Never assume “freedom” is something, that opposing classes and groups in general agree upon when it comes to its definition.

    • cmbabul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      We should really be doing that regardless, the corporation has outlived its utility and has become a chain on the collective neck of humanity