In a televised address to the French on Wednesday, the French president described Russia as a 'threat to France and Europe,' and said he wanted to confer with European allies on using France's nuclear deterrent to protect Europe.
It’s not as straight forward as asking permission, but you should read about Trident as a missle platform.
To say the UK has a genuinely independent nuclear deterent is not as clear cut as you’d think. But that’s not the same as being absolutely beholden to the US.
That all said, we really do need to swap to the french missle system, but that will take time to retro fit the subs.
5-7 years iirc according to the article I read. After that failure rates start going up, not sure how long the curve from 0-100% is though.
Bottom line the UK (and the rest of the EU) need to start getting missile factories stood up. Not just for trident but for all the other arms we get off the US.
It’s not as straight forward as asking permission, but you should read about Trident as a missle platform.
To say the UK has a genuinely independent nuclear deterent is not as clear cut as you’d think. But that’s not the same as being absolutely beholden to the US.
That all said, we really do need to swap to the french missle system, but that will take time to retro fit the subs.
The UK outsourced maintenance of the delivery mechanism (the missile body) to the US.
The warhead is built & maintained by the UK.
The missiles have a life span so eventually they will stop working without US help.
Sure, the crux is how long is eventually. We may need that sooner than we previously thought.
5-7 years iirc according to the article I read. After that failure rates start going up, not sure how long the curve from 0-100% is though.
Bottom line the UK (and the rest of the EU) need to start getting missile factories stood up. Not just for trident but for all the other arms we get off the US.