cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days agoLike programming in bashlemmy.mlimagemessage-square182fedilinkarrow-up11.57Karrow-down116cross-posted to: wwwopera@lemm.eeprogrammerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.55Karrow-down1imageLike programming in bashlemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days agomessage-square182fedilinkcross-posted to: wwwopera@lemm.eeprogrammerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squarezarathustra0@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 day agoNo, Makefile syntax is more extreme.
minus-squarespicystraw@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·23 hours agoSure, but bash is more relatable, I think
minus-squareXanza@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·19 hours agoI swapped from Make to Just: https://github.com/casey/just Way better, IMO. Super simple logic, just as flexible.
minus-squareMajorHavoc@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·21 hours agoI find Makefile isn’t too bad, as long as I can stay away from automake and autoreconf.
No, Makefile syntax is more extreme.
Sure, but bash is more relatable, I think
I swapped from Make to Just: https://github.com/casey/just
Way better, IMO. Super simple logic, just as flexible.
I find
Makefileisn’t too bad, as long as I can stay away fromautomakeandautoreconf.