• Brainsploosh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    I’m not convinced the EU is monolithic enough for bad blood to matter, there’s enough member states with enough history that someone will always have issues with someone.

    What I do believe will be a point of contention though are all the special dispensations the UK have had. With the power balance as it is today, UK might have to face membership on equal terms with the other member states this time around.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yeah, the UK would be bargaining from a weak position. As a founding member of the EU it was bargaining from a strong one and could get concessions.

      But, maybe if they say “hey, let us in and give us some exceptions and we’ll let you talk to our good buddy Canada”…

      • Riddick3001@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        As a founding member of the EU.

        They were not a founding member though. They joined in 1973-1975 and have negotiated many exceptions to the EEC, causing other memberstates sometimes a bit of headaches.

        "Brenter " would be a good idea, but like it’s been said, there are ( British) political and systematic (compliance) hurdles. But they can be overcome.

        Imo, Britain needs to clean the house first, from the lying (Ukip )traitors, who sold your country out. Also, during crises, lots can happen, quickly. Necessity is a huge drive force, especially in Politics, maybe we’ll all be pleasantly surprised.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          They were a founding member in the way Musk “founds” companies: joining later and getting a lot of influence due to wealth